|
Overview
Bighorn Sheep/Selenium Study 2002
John Mionczynski - Project Coordinator
| File
List:
-
Written Summary "Bighorn Sheep/Selenium
Study 2002" VIEW>>
-
Water Chemistry Middle Mountain 2002 VIEW>>
-
GPS locations of 3 bighorn ewes in 2002 VIEW>>
-
GPS locations of 3 bighorn ewes in 2001 VIEW>>
-
30"x 30" Test Plot Schematic VIEW>>
-
Middle Mountain Forage Selenium Test Plots 2002
Results VIEW>>
-
Middle Mountain Redox Values 2002 VIEW>>
-
Seasonal Range Forage Selenium Whiskey Mountain
Herd 2002 VIEW>>
-
Nutritional Levels Whiskey Mountain Seasonal
Ranges VIEW>>
-
Species Specific Forage Selenium Levels 2002
VIEW>>
-
Forage Selenium Values of Wild Sheep & Goat
Ranges 2002 VIEW>>
-
Photo (3 Scenes) - Forage Collection, Test Plots,
Redox Probes VIEW>>
-
Bighorn Sheep Print and order form
VIEW>>
These
documents available in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. If
you do not already have it, you will need to download
the most recent version of Free
Adobe Acrobat Reader to view these files.
|
|
The summer 2002 field research program was conducted with the
purpose of maintaining data collection as part of ongoing Bighorn
Sheep/Selenium Study initiated in 1998. Additions to the data
base were proposed in five distinct areas of interest: 1) monitoring
rainfall and subsequent chemical analysis for concentration of
nitrate, sulfate and ammonium; 2) monitoring of bighorn sheep
health, movement, and lambing success through five seasonal ranges;
3) monitoring experimental test plots on the alpine summer range
to determine effects of varying amounts of water and nitrates
on forage selenium uptake, and continuing to look at soil redox
potentials relative to selenium speciation and availability; 4)
a study of the local soil microbial populations for a possible
role in selenium transformations and transport; and 5) an attempt
to establish baseline data for forage selenium levels on other
mountain sheep ranges for comparison to the Whiskey/Arrow/Middle
Mountain forages where selenium responsive disorders (SRD) are
suspected of threatening herd productivity and perhaps survival.
Although previously funded by The Wyoming Game
and Fish Department, Foundation for North American Wild Sheep,
U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and private groups
and individuals, financial support for the continuation of this
study in 2002 was made possible by grants from private sources
(see acknowledgements) under management of the University of Wyoming.
The establishment of the experimental test plots and training
of a field crew was delayed until early July because of the lateness
of obtaining necessary funding. Therefore we were not able to
implement the experimental portion of the study in a way that
replicated the previous year's work. In addition, the severe drought
that continued throughout the summer made it difficult and in
some cases impossible to replicate the study design. Consequently
we have treated and interpreted the results of this part of the
study with due caution and only in qualitative terms. Regarding
the research budget for 2002, not all of the proposed equipment
items were purchased and not all of the proposed research activities
completed since project expenses greatly exceeded funds available.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
1) Precipitation: Only ten rain events produced
measurable amounts of precipitation compared with nineteen in
2001. Precipitation was measured using a standard rain gauge and
all rain events, which produced sufficient quantities, were analyzed
for NO3, SO4 and NH4 using a Hach spectrophotometer (see table
for Water Chemistry Middle Mountain 2002). The entry for 70702
with an exceptionally high reading for sulfate (37mg/L) was run
twice as a suspected contamination outlier. It is quite possible
that these high levels could be the result of deposition by forest
fires located upwind of the study area and active at the time
of measurement. The nitrate concentrations are similar to those
collected on the same site in 2001. The very small quantities
of precipitation and an almost complete absence of fog resulted
in a low overall nitrate deposition for 2002. As indicated in
the table four of the ten rain events exceeded the low range mode
of the spectrophotometer and were not reanalyzed in the high range.
Therefore these nitrate levels may have been higher. Total nitrate
in precipitation = > 11.352 mg/L (ppm): deposition = > 0.702
kg/ha NO3: total for 2001 = 1.455 kg/ha NO3. We reran some rain
samples at a later date to determine if chemical levels and pH
varied over time in storage (see yellow highlight in table).
2) Sheep Migration and Health: Drought also
affected the winter snow deposition. The early melt encouraged
early emergence of some forage species that was followed by early
curing. During the migration from winter range to lambing grounds,
the sheep bypassed the Lake Louise area (8,600 ft.) where most
of the lambs were born in 1998. We assume this was because the
forage at that time was sparse and dry. Vegetation was denser,
more succulent, and more palatable on the higher historic lambing
grounds of Middle Mountain (10,800 to 11,500 ft.) and at Goat
Flat (11,500 to 12,500 ft.) where most of this year's lambing
took place. Winter snowfields receded quickly and spring rains
were nearly absent. This resulted in extremely low productivity
of forage species above 11,000 ft., accompanied by early maturation
and curing.
Most ewes left Middle Mountain lambing and nursery areas early
in June and did not return except sporadically to utilize selenium
mineral blocks placed at Three-Four Pass (located about the middle
of Middle Mountain), and during the fall migration to Whiskey
Mountain. Although sixteen ewes remained on Middle Mountain the
bulk of the population scattered in small groups into higher remote
regions far from the Middle Mountain study area and were nearly
impossible to monitor.
Dispersal patterns of sheep as detected by radio telemetry where
indicated south and west of Middle Mountain near Downs Lake, No
Man’s Pass, Spider Peak, Goat Flat, and the edges of Continental
Glacier. Locations of a GPS collared ewe monitored by the Wyoming
Game & Fish Department, downloaded to a topographic map (see
map of GPS locations 2002) reflects the aberrant pattern sheep
exhibited this year (the migration pattern representative of our
study group is circled). They passed over Middle Mountain on well-established
migration trails but unlike previous years they moved onto more
remote summer ranges where residual mountain snows provided more
favorable forage growth.
Therefore, in contrast to 2001, the GPS locations map for 2002
shows a lesser amount of foraging time (cluster of dots) spent
on Middle Mountain and this was reflected in fewer numbers of
observations and subsequent fewer lamb sightings (see maps of
GPS locations 2001 and 2002). Middle Mountain was also the area
where, in 1998 most of the ewe and lamb activity was concentrated,
and symptoms of White Muscle Disease (WMD) were noted.
The 2002 summer range lamb/ewe ratio was 49 lambs/100 adult ewes.
The ratio is based on a small number of sightings (n = 10) apparently
due to the drought conditions. The sheep appeared healthy with
no indications of WMD or any other illnesses. Lamb/ewe ratios
in 2002 were higher than in 1998 (9 lambs/100 ewes). Despite the
encouraging summer counts, recent winter range counts show a sharp
decline in 2002 to 14 lambs/100 ewes. Additional observations
are needed on the winter range to assess the reason for this disparity.
Observations of symptoms of WMD (selenium deficiency) in sheep
during July of 1998 (a high precipitation year) followed by the
absence of observed symptoms in the following three dry years
prompted us to conduct a comparative forage analysis to look for
correlations between forage selenium and rainfall. Comparisons
of periods of high and low rainfall over a thirty-year span indicated
a loose inverse relationship between lamb recruitment and relative
precipitation in the Middle Mountain area.
3) Experimental Plots: Preliminary test plot
results from 2001 indicated that: a. increases in soil nitrate
levels inversely effected selenium levels; b. sulfates had no
effect on forage selenium and c. the addition of alkalinity to
the soil had no effect on forage selenium. These plots were located
in a typical felfield site.
Plans for 2002 included two test plot sites, one in typical felfield,
and one in typical alpine meadow vegetation. Due to extreme drought
conditions in 2002 at alpine elevations no xeric sites could be
used for study, since the required quantity of vegetation for
analysis could not be obtained. Thus the felfield test was abandoned.
Only one site with sufficient soil moisture for the mesic alpine
meadow type was found. A covered test plot sequence of nine covered
plots was established there with the addition of an uncovered
control plot receiving no experimental treatments, but allowed
to receive normal precipitation. Plots were 30 inches square,
covered with a 48-inch square greenhouse fiberglass rain shield
raised ten inches off the ground for airflow. Plots were selected
to contain, as nearly possible, equal composition and density
of vegetation while avoiding high percentages of nonforage species.
The intent was to show the effects of systematic additions of
both water and nitrates on selenium levels in alpine plant species
utilized by bighorn ewes. An additional plot was added later to
which NH4OH was added at the rate of 3.5ppm/liter every second
day. This became plot #10. The uncovered control plot became plot
#11 (see Test Plot Schematic).
Since reduction/oxidation potentials are known to effect selenium
availability in plants, redox probes were set in plots #4, #11,
and a nearby felfield area for comparison (occasionally listed
here as plot #12).
Plots were watered every second day to simulate increasing nitrate
deposition (horizontal axis, left to right), and increasing moisture
(vertical axis, downward) through the growing season (July and
August). In the initial phase plots were clipped and analyzed
for selenium. Subsequently plots were clipped and analyzed once
a month for two months. The effects of nitrates on forage selenium
in alpine meadow vegetation type were inconclusive (see Test Plots
2002 Results).
There however was a direct correlation in July between available
soil selenium (selenate and selenite) and forage selenium in the
test plots (r = 0.670) based on soil analysis by Bruce Mincher
at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
(INEEL). The correlation between available selenium and percent
change in forage selenium between July and August was lower (r
= 0.409).
Redox potentials generally were higher on dryer soils indicating
as expected more available (oxidized) selenium species, and lower
on wetter soils indicating less available (reduced) species as
expected. Preliminary tests in 2001on Middle Mountain produced
similar results (see Redox Values 2002).
4) Soil Microbial Analyses: It is possible that
differences exist in the microbiota between felfield soils studied
in 2001 and alpine meadow soils studied in 2002 affecting the
availability of selenium differently in the presence of nitrates.
Since fungal and or bacterial activity is suspected of playing
a critical role in the mobility of selenium in the soil, microbial
studies are crucial to an understanding of these data. Soil samples
were collected at each monthly clipping and frozen for microbial
analysis. Unfortunately our research budget is overspent and we
do not presently have the funds to analyze these samples. Preliminary
identifications made by Drs. Jack States and Martha Christensen
in 2001confirm the presence of selenium reducing fungi in Middle
Mountain test plots. These fungi were found capable of reducing
available selenite and selenate to dimethyl selenide or elemental
selenium, both unavailable to vascular plants.
5) Forage Selenium Analyses: Included here is
a list of forage selenium levels collected in 2002 from the seasonal
ranges of the Whiskey Mountain herd (see table for Seasonal Range
Forage Selenium). These confirm that forage on the winter range
associated with the lower (Phosphoria) geologic formation has
higher levels of selenium (mean = 0.152 ppm). These levels are
well within the recommended range for health in domestic sheep
(0.1 – 0.2 ppm) based on National Research Council (NRC)
standards of recommended requirements (see table for Nutrient
Levels Whiskey Mountain Seasonal Ranges). The high summer ranges
located on granitic soils have levels well below these standards
(mean = 0.043 ppm). If the hypothesis of an inverse relationship
between rainfall (i.e. nitrate deposition) and forage selenium
is correct these levels could easily drop into a critical health
compromising range (< 0.20 ppm) in wet years. It is important
to note that as yet no standards for forage selenium exist for
bighorn sheep.
Species-specific selenium analyses were run on important forage
species to help illuminate the variations in species uptake and
availability of selenium to sheep in the habitat. Of special interest
is the high nutritional level of selenium found in Chrysothamnus
nauseosus, a shrubby plant on the winter range, often grouped
with weedy species. It may prove to be nutritionally important
because of its high selenium level in this range. The sheep have
been known to show a particular appetite for this species (see
table for Species Specific Forage Selenium Levels). An annual
monitoring of key forage species for selenium is recommended.
Notably almost all other nutritional components tested fall within
NRC standards with the exception of sodium and total digestible
nutrients (TDN), which are below recommended levels while iron
is high, approaching the toxic level in some samples.
The TDN are not low enough to be of concern. However sodium is
very low (0.009 and 0.006) (recommended level = 0.360). The placement
of sodium chloride blocks on Arrow Mountain in 2001 established
that sheep migrations to mineral licks are controlled by sodium
and can be altered by artificial sources. This herd has had salt
available in the form of blocks since the 1950's and possibly
since the 1930's. Because inappetence is the primary result of
sodium deficiency, the deficient levels of forage sodium in the
absence of supplemental blocks, could exaggerate other nutritional
deficiencies such as selenium responsive disorders (SRD). Although
not analyzed this year due to the expense of these analyses, sulfur
and cobalt should also be analyzed in the future as they both
influence selenium uptake and metabolism.
Collections were made this summer of forage from other bighorn
sheep ranges (see table for Forage Selenium Values of Various
Wild Sheep and Goat Ranges) in an attempt to begin the process
of establishing baseline data for selenium levels on historic
sheep ranges. It is interesting to note that selenium levels are
similar (double digits ppb) in three locations where sheep populations
are known to be declining – Wind River’s in Wyoming
(mean = 0.0717 ppm), Lemhi’s in Idaho (mean = 0.0040 ppm),
the Fraser River herd in British Columbia (mean = 0.0568 ppm),
and one range where rocky mountain goats have been confirmed to
have WMD in the Purcell Mountains of British Columbia (Hebert
1971) (mean = 0.0612 ppm). All forage collections were made this
summer and were analyzed at the same lab, Olson Biochemistry Laboratory,
South Dakota State University at Brookings, to avoid differences
in analytical procedures. The herd listed under the heading British
Columbia only recently began feeding on this forage so herd status
cannot be assessed (Dr. Helen Schwantje, wildlife veterinarian
- Biodiversity Branch Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection,
Victoria, B.C. - personal communication).
Forage selenium levels are almost identical for the Whiskey Mountain
summer range in the northern portion of the Wind River Mountains,
and the Lemhi Mountains where the sheep population (originally
transplanted from Whiskey Mountain) has dwindled from 41 animals
to 6 in the last twenty years – Northern Wind River Range
(mean = 0.043 ppm); Lemhi Range (mean = 0.040 ppm). These levels
are below the NRC standards for domestic sheep.
The Gros Ventre Range herd has also experienced a recent population
decline (winter/spring of 2002). Here the opposite situation of
selenium levels may be involved. An examination of this forage
availability revealed elevated selenium levels, which under winter
conditions of crusted snow cover, may be well into the toxic range
due the ubiquitous presence of the selenium converter plant, Astragalus
bisulcatus. This, however, is beyond the scope of this study.
The remaining ranges with known sheep populations did not exhibit
population declines. Forage selenium is within the NRC recommended
levels – Absorokas (0.126 ppm); Owl Creeks (mean = 0.225
ppm); Sierra Nevadas (mean = 0.284 ppm [species specific analysis]).
There is a significant difference (p = 0.042) between the selenium
levels on summer range forage samples where sheep populations
are declining (n = 19; mean = 0.60 ppm; SD = 0.061 ppm) and forage
of summer ranges where populations are stable (n = 7; mean = 0.237
ppm; SD = 0.181 ppm). This suggests that population size may be
influenced by forage selenium levels.
Although many factors affect population dynamics, it is possible
that lamb recruitment data can be used as an indicator of low
selenium availability. The fact that selenium plays a pivotal
role in so many physiological functions in ungulates from immune
response, muscle growth, milk production, to body temperature
regulation, it is not unreasonable to suspect that population
size and lamb survival may be effected by a critically low availability
of this nutrient.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
To realize its full significance the investigation of the bighorn
sheep/selenium/atmospheric nitrogen deposition relationship needs
to be extended to additional sheep ranges. It is recognized that
the subject of selenium responsive disorders, particularly in
the purview of this hypothesis involving the interactions of nitrates,
soil chemistry, microbial conversions, plant assimilations, and
animal heath is affected by a multitude of environmental variables
which are not yet fully understood.
Lab based research under controlled conditions may be necessary
to eliminate many of the variables found in the field. The geochemical
aspect of selenium availability is of great importance and needs
further study. Atmospheric deposition parameters need to be delineated
in much greater detail especially in regard to the affect of elevation
on deposition. Also, the backtracking of weather patterns is crucial
to understanding the wide fluctuations in nitrate concentrations
in precipitation. Seasonal blood draws from ewes and lambs for
Glutathione peroxidase analysis should be instituted to monitor
variations in blood selenium seasonally and year to year. Most
importantly it is critical to establish a clinical diagnosis of
WMD in lambs within the study area. Many of these goals would
be most readily achieved during high rainfall years. A plan of
action contingent on the appearance of a wet spring and summer
is suggested. A captive bighorn-feeding program could establish
exact levels of selenium and related nutrients required to produce
SRD and clinical WMD.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Grants for Research: Dr. J. David Love and Family; Dr. Martha
Christensen;
The Nature Conservancy; Mrs. Anne Johnson
WE ALSO WISH TO THANK THE FOLLOWING:
Spectrophotometers loaned to us by: Dr. Evert Brown of Casper
College
Suki Smaglik - Central Wyoming College
Research Advisors:
Dr. Jack and Mrs. Diantha States
Dr. Martha Christensen - University of Wyoming
Dr. Steve Williams - University of Wyoming
Dr. J. David Love - U.S. Geological Survey
Pat Hnilicka - U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Dr. Bruce Mincher - Idaho National Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory
Dr. Evert Brown - Casper College
Justin Naderman - Idaho Fish & Game Dept.
Dr. Darryl Hebert - Consultant - Creston, B.C., Canada
Helen Schwantje, DVM - Biodiversity Branch, Ministry of Water,
Land, and
Air Protection - B.C., Canada
Dr. Duane Siemer – Idaho National Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory
Direction and Administration of Research Funds:
Dr. Steve Williams - University of Wyoming
|